Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
b1d89b9783 perf(FiveSql2): PcOpFieldTrim fused peephole — string WHERE at raw RDD parity
Second pcode peephole to match the one added for FieldGet(literal).
SqlExprToPrg auto-wraps CHAR column references with AllTrim() to
match SqlCmpEq's CHAR-padding trim semantics, so every string WHERE
predicate evaluates `AllTrim(FieldGet(n)) == 'literal'` per row.

Before this commit each of those per-row evaluations did:
  1. PushSymbol ALLTRIM
  2. PushSymbol FIELDGET → Function(1)  [1 RTL Frame]
  3. parseCharField → MakeString       [alloc: copies raw bytes]
  4. Function(1) → AllTrim RTL         [1 RTL Frame]
  5. strings.TrimSpace                  [alloc: new string]
  6. Return, continue

New opcode `PcOpFieldTrim <idx>` (0x47) fuses the two RTL calls into
a single opcode that:
  1. Calls FastFieldGetter directly (no Frame/Function dispatch).
  2. Walks the returned string with ASCII-space trim in place.
  3. Pushes `s[lo:hi]` — a sub-slice, no new allocation.
  4. Short-circuits back to the same string if no trim needed.

genpc recognizes the shape `AllTrim(FieldGet(<int-literal>))` in
emitCall and emits the fused opcode automatically — no SQL-side
API change. Matches the existing FieldGet peephole's shape.

Bench impact (50k rows, 3-run steady state, vs raw RDD baseline 6.2ms):

  String WHERE          before 7.9ms → after 6.2ms   1.00x (parity!)
  Numeric WHERE         6.9ms (unchanged)            1.11x
  No WHERE              9.1ms (unchanged)            1.47x

String WHERE is now at parity with the raw Harbour-style RDD scan.
Compared to session start (119ms), that's a 19x speedup.

Validation:
  - FiveSql2 43/43
  - Harbour compat 51/51
  - go test ./... ALL PASS

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 14:03:03 +09:00
f9ffd4050e perf(FiveSql2): FieldGet peephole + DBFArea devirt — WHERE at ~1.15x raw RDD
Two stacked optimizations land on the SqlScan hot path. Combined
effect on the 50k-row benchmark:

                       Before    After   vs raw
  Numeric WHERE        10.2ms    7.8ms   1.15x
  String WHERE         10.5ms    7.9ms   1.15x
  No WHERE              9.2ms   10.0ms   1.45x
  Raw RDD baseline      6.8ms    6.8ms   1.00x

WHERE-predicate paths are now within 15% of the raw Harbour-style
RDD scan loop. The no-WHERE path is unchanged (slight jitter from
the added devirt branch); FieldGet peephole doesn't apply there.

--- Optimization 1: PcOpFieldGet peephole ---

Adds a new pcode opcode `PcOpFieldGet <fieldIdx>` (0x46) that skips
the usual PushSymbol+Function+Frame+FieldGet-RTL+EndProc chain and
calls a direct field getter closure instead. genpc recognizes the
shape `FieldGet(<int-literal>)` during emitCall and emits the
specialized opcode automatically — no SQL-side API change.

Integration:
  * hbrt.Thread.FastFieldGetter  — hot-path closure set by scan loops.
                                   Non-nil → pcode bypasses dispatch.
                                   Nil → pcode resolves FIELDGET via
                                   the RTL symbol table (correctness
                                   fallback for any other callers).
  * compiler/genpc/genpc.go      — peephole in emitCall.
  * hbrt/pcinterp.go             — PcOpFieldGet handler.

This alone cut numeric WHERE from 10.2 → 7.9ms: eliminated roughly
one full Frame/EndProc + RTL dispatch per row × 50k rows.

--- Optimization 2: DBFArea devirtualization ---

SqlScan type-asserts the workarea to *dbf.DBFArea once and runs a
dedicated loop that calls GoTop/EOF/Skip/GetValue directly on the
concrete type. Go's compiler inlines these, skipping the interface
vtable per row. Non-DBF drivers still work via the generic Area
branch.

The FastFieldGetter closure also captures *DBFArea directly in the
DBF branch, so the WHERE predicate side of the hot loop is now
entirely devirtualized: no interface dispatch between the pcode
dispatch loop and the DBF record buffer.

Validation:
  - FiveSql2 43/43
  - Harbour compat 51/51
  - go test ./... ALL PASS

Remaining gap to raw RDD on no-WHERE (~1.45x) is dominated by the
two-column row construction + ArraySlab + flat backing bookkeeping
that the raw loop doesn't do. Going below that requires changing
the SQL engine's result shape — out of scope here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 12:23:31 +09:00
6b26f1b642 feat: genpc.CompileExpr + PcCompile/PcEval runtime bytecode API
Expose Five's existing FRB bytecode compiler for single-expression
compilation, enabling prepared-statement-style caching in dynamic
query engines (FiveSql2, scripting layers, rule engines).

1. genpc.CompileExpr(ast.Expr) *hbrt.PcodeFunc
   - New public API that compiles a single expression to a
     standalone pcode function
   - Reuses genpc's mature emitExpr (no new emit logic)
   - ExecPcode manages the frame around the generated code

2. hbrtl.PcCompile(cPrgExpr) -> pFunc
   - RTL entry point for runtime compilation
   - Wraps the expression in a FUNCTION stub, uses the full PRG
     parser pipeline (pp + parser + genpc), extracts the compiled
     pcode function, returns it as an opaque pointer
   - Callers pay parse+compile cost ONCE per expression

3. hbrtl.PcEval(pFunc) -> xValue
   - RTL entry point for runtime execution
   - Calls hbrt.ExecPcode; the pcode's RetValue opcode sets retVal,
     which our EndProc preserves as PcEval's return value
   - ~1.2x slower than direct FieldGet (pcode interpreter overhead),
     but eliminates AST tree-walk per row for complex expressions

Usage (FiveSql2 hot path, planned):
   pc := PcCompile("FieldGet(4) > 50000")  // parse+compile once
   WHILE !Eof()
      IF PcEval(pc)                         // ~10us per row
         AAdd(aRows, ...)
      ENDIF
      dbSkip()
   ENDDO

Benchmark (50k records, WHERE salary > 50000):
   Raw FieldGet:      7.9 ms  (baseline)
   FieldPos+Get:     10.2 ms  (with O(1) FieldPos cache)
   PcEval bytecode:  10.1 ms  (interpreted bytecode)
   MacroEval:        parse+eval per row — orders of magnitude slower

Tests:
   go test ./...        ALL PASS (14 packages)
   FiveSql2 43/43       100%
   compat_harbour       51/51
   PcCompile/PcEval     verified on 50k-row scan

FiveSql2 engine integration deferred — requires careful PRG-level
refactoring to thread pcode pointers through the plan structure.
The Go-level infrastructure is now in place for that work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 07:57:52 +09:00
59568f3301 Five v0.9 — Harbour + Go fusion language
- Compiler: PP → Lexer → Parser → Analyzer → Gengo pipeline
- Parser: 232/236 (98%) Harbour compatibility, registry-based dispatch
- RTL: 351 Harbour-compatible functions
- RDD: DBF/NTX/CDX engines with Rushmore bitmap optimization
- Go Interop: IMPORT + pkg.Func() + obj:Method() with FastPath (15M calls/sec)
- HB_FUNC API: Full Harbour C API compatible Go bridge
- Concurrency: SPAWN/LAUNCH/GOROUTINE, <-, WATCH, PARALLEL FOR, ASYNC/AWAIT
- Extensions: Multi-return, DEFER, Slice, f-string, Nil-safe ?:, CONST
- Macro Compiler: Runtime AST parsing and evaluation
- Debugger: TUI debugger with source display, breakpoints, stepping
- FRB: Native + Pcode dual mode runtime binary
- Tests: 13 packages ALL PASS

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-31 09:41:50 +09:00