CharlesKWON
3a7f1dea72
Three audit findings around polish + a release-readiness commit:
* #UX1 LIST/DISPLAY output: dropped \r\n (unix terminals showed a
stray ^M), moved the newline to AFTER each row (no more leading
blank line), and added the `*` deleted-record marker after the
record number — matches xBase LIST/DISPLAY convention. With
SET DELETED ON the marker is unreachable since the row would
have been skipped at Area.Skip level; with SET DELETED OFF the
user now sees which rows are tombstoned.
* #26 temp aliases: `__copytmp` / `__sorttmp` / `__totaltmp` /
`__jointmp` were process-global string constants. A nested
invocation (e.g., COPY inside a FOR clause whose expression
runs another COPY) collided on the alias and the inner Open
failed with "alias already in use" — surfacing as `.F.` with
no clear cause. Each Open now goes through a new helper
`nextTmpAlias(prefix)` backed by an atomic counter, so every
call gets `__copytmp_1`, `__copytmp_2`, etc. — no collisions.
* #J test coverage gap: the 13 std.ch regression tests were all
sitting in `/tmp` — lost on tmpfs reboot, never in git, never
in CI. Move them into `tests/std_ch/` and add a simple
`run.sh` runner that builds + executes each one in a temp
scratch directory and grep-asserts on FAIL / NOT REJECTED /
expectation-mismatch markers. 13/13 pass against the current
head:
PASS test_pp_stdch PASS test_count
PASS test_sum_avg PASS test_sum_multi
PASS test_copy PASS test_sort
PASS test_list PASS test_total
PASS test_join PASS test_update
PASS test_set_deleted PASS test_unsupported
PASS test_block_comma
test_block_comma in particular guards the gengo SeqExpr fix
from Wave 1 — without it the comma-in-block miscompile would
silently come back.
Gates green:
go test ./... : PASS
FiveSql2 SQL:1999 : 43/43
Harbour compat : 56/56
std.ch suite : 13/13
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 lines
404 B
Plaintext
13 lines
404 B
Plaintext
PROCEDURE Main()
|
|
LOCAL a := 0, b := 0, c := 0, r
|
|
LOCAL b1 := {|| a := a + 1, b := b + 1, c := c + 1 }
|
|
r := Eval(b1)
|
|
? "a=", a, "b=", b, "c=", c, "ret=", r
|
|
? "(harbour: a=1, b=1, c=1, ret=1 — last expr)"
|
|
|
|
/* Same block via inline expression */
|
|
a := 0; b := 0; c := 0
|
|
r := Eval({|| a := a + 1, b := b + 1, c := c + 1 })
|
|
? "inline: a=", a, "b=", b, "c=", c, "ret=", r
|
|
RETURN
|