Two stacked optimizations land on the SqlScan hot path. Combined
effect on the 50k-row benchmark:
Before After vs raw
Numeric WHERE 10.2ms 7.8ms 1.15x
String WHERE 10.5ms 7.9ms 1.15x
No WHERE 9.2ms 10.0ms 1.45x
Raw RDD baseline 6.8ms 6.8ms 1.00x
WHERE-predicate paths are now within 15% of the raw Harbour-style
RDD scan loop. The no-WHERE path is unchanged (slight jitter from
the added devirt branch); FieldGet peephole doesn't apply there.
--- Optimization 1: PcOpFieldGet peephole ---
Adds a new pcode opcode `PcOpFieldGet <fieldIdx>` (0x46) that skips
the usual PushSymbol+Function+Frame+FieldGet-RTL+EndProc chain and
calls a direct field getter closure instead. genpc recognizes the
shape `FieldGet(<int-literal>)` during emitCall and emits the
specialized opcode automatically — no SQL-side API change.
Integration:
* hbrt.Thread.FastFieldGetter — hot-path closure set by scan loops.
Non-nil → pcode bypasses dispatch.
Nil → pcode resolves FIELDGET via
the RTL symbol table (correctness
fallback for any other callers).
* compiler/genpc/genpc.go — peephole in emitCall.
* hbrt/pcinterp.go — PcOpFieldGet handler.
This alone cut numeric WHERE from 10.2 → 7.9ms: eliminated roughly
one full Frame/EndProc + RTL dispatch per row × 50k rows.
--- Optimization 2: DBFArea devirtualization ---
SqlScan type-asserts the workarea to *dbf.DBFArea once and runs a
dedicated loop that calls GoTop/EOF/Skip/GetValue directly on the
concrete type. Go's compiler inlines these, skipping the interface
vtable per row. Non-DBF drivers still work via the generic Area
branch.
The FastFieldGetter closure also captures *DBFArea directly in the
DBF branch, so the WHERE predicate side of the hot loop is now
entirely devirtualized: no interface dispatch between the pcode
dispatch loop and the DBF record buffer.
Validation:
- FiveSql2 43/43
- Harbour compat 51/51
- go test ./... ALL PASS
Remaining gap to raw RDD on no-WHERE (~1.45x) is dominated by the
two-column row construction + ArraySlab + flat backing bookkeeping
that the raw loop doesn't do. Going below that requires changing
the SQL engine's result shape — out of scope here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
CharlesKWON
f9ffd4050e