+ harbour/tests/oleenum.prg
+ added Enrico example and test code for enumerators and OLE objects
* harbour/contrib/Makefile
* enabled hbole, ado_rdd, hybodbc in most of Windows builds
* harbour/contrib/ole2/win32ole.prg
* harbour/contrib/ole2/w32ole.c
* synced with recent Ron's modifications in xHarbour
I'd like to ask Windows users to make tests with above
oleenum.prg and example sent by Luis
* harbour/source/rtl/gttrm/gttrm.c
* disable ACS mode before sending BEL on Linux compatibile terminals
- some of them may try to display chr(7) instead of generating
sound when ACSC is enabled
* harbour/source/vm/proc.c
+ added support for character parameter in PROCFILE() - now it can
accept <nLevel> | <sFuncSym> | <cFuncName> as first parameter
* harbour/source/vm/dynsym.c
* added support for detecting not cleanly overloaded by linker .prg
functions.
In such case hb_dynsymNew() checks if linker updated function
addresses and if yes then remove unnecessary HB_FS_LOCAL flag.
In such case works GCC (but not MinGW and DJGPP), OpwenWatcom
for Linux, DOS, Windows (and probably for OS2), POCC, XCC (with
/FORCE:MULTIPLE linker switch) and some other linkers I haven't
tested.
Otherwise (two different functions with the same name linked and
each accessible from different symbol, f.e. BCC32, MinGW, DJGPP)
it accept multiple HB_FS_LOCAL for dynamically loaded modules
(.hrb, .dll, .so, .dyn, ...) if HVM also accepted it (for future
KEEP_LOCAL_FUNC HB_LIBLOAD()/__HBRLOAD() parameter).
For statically linked modules it overloads one of the functions when
HB_OVERLOAD_MULTIPLE_FUNC macro is set (now by default to make tests
with different linkers). I left detail description in source code of
hb_dynsymNew() in source/vm/dynsym.c.
I hope it will also help Ron in recent xHarbour modifications - AFAIK
it's sth what he tires to do.
Anyhow please remember that that dirty overloading any symbols by
linker is very bad idea and in such case you have big chance that
wrong binaries will be created so the most preferable choice is
eliminating such situations and not using linker switches like
-Wl,--allow-multiple-definition or /FORCE:MULTIPLE
+ harbour/tests/multifnc
+ harbour/tests/multifnc/t0.prg
+ harbour/tests/multifnc/t1.prg
+ harbour/tests/multifnc/t2.prg
+ harbour/tests/multifnc/Makefile
+ added test code for results of dirty overloaded functions.
With recent modifications expected results are:
main t0.prg t0.prg
alert t1.prg t1.prg [ALERT]
p0 t0.prg t0.prg P0:t0.prg P0:t0.prg OK
p1 t0.prg t0.prg P1:t0.prg P1:t0.prg OK
p2 t1.prg t1.prg P2:t1.prg P2:t1.prg OK
p3 t0.prg t0.prg P3:t0.prg P3:t0.prg OK
p4 t1.prg t1.prg P4:t1.prg P4:t1.prg OK
p5 t2.prg t2.prg P5:t2.prg P5:t2.prg OK
===
main2 t1.prg t1.prg
alert t1.prg t1.prg [ALERT]
p0 t0.prg t0.prg P0:t0.prg P0:t0.prg OK
p1 t0.prg t0.prg P1:t0.prg P1:t0.prg OK
p2 t1.prg t1.prg P2:t1.prg P2:t1.prg OK
p3 t0.prg t0.prg P3:t0.prg P3:t0.prg OK
p4 t1.prg t1.prg P4:t1.prg P4:t1.prg OK
p5 t2.prg t2.prg P5:t2.prg P5:t2.prg OK
===
main3 t2.prg t2.prg
alert t1.prg t1.prg [ALERT]
p0 t0.prg t0.prg P0:t0.prg P0:t0.prg OK
p1 t0.prg t0.prg P1:t0.prg P1:t0.prg OK
p2 t1.prg t1.prg P2:t1.prg P2:t1.prg OK
p3 t0.prg t0.prg P3:t0.prg P3:t0.prg OK
p4 t1.prg t1.prg P4:t1.prg P4:t1.prg OK
p5 t2.prg t2.prg P5:t2.prg P5:t2.prg OK
I've tested only few compilers: GCC/G++ (Linux) MinGW (WINE-W32),
DJGPP (DOSEMU), OpenWatcom (Linux, WINE-W32, DOSEMU), XCC/POCC
(WINE-W32) and I'm interesting in results from other compiler/
platforms, f.e. from M[V]SC.
0efe049e5d