Files
harbour-core/harbour/website/faq/harbour46.html
Viktor Szakats 2688ce2212 2013-01-24 15:14 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour syenar.net)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
    + links to markdown and markdown to man-page converter tool
    ! minor cleanup to prev

  * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.1
    * some updates

  * ChangeLog.txt
    ! typos/updates in previous entry

  * extras/hbdoc/*.prg
  * src/rtl/memoedit.prg
  * tests/clasinh.prg
  * tests/classch.prg
  * tests/inhprob.prg
    ! updated for new ::super: syntax

  * src/rtl/itemseri.c
    ! fixed typo in latest modification:
      'warning: use of unary operator that may be intended as compound assignment (+=)'

  * contrib/hbgd/tests/test_out.prg
  * contrib/hbhttpd/*
  * contrib/hbtip/thtml.prg
  * contrib/xhb/*.prg
  * extras/httpsrv/*
  * extras/guestbk/*
  * website/faq/*.html
  * website/samples/HowToBuildOnLinux.html
  * website/third-party.html
    * some steps to modernize old HTML

  * extras/hbdoc/*.prg
    * do not use [] as string delimiter

  - tests/function.cfm
  - website/samples/function.cfm.html
  * .gitattributes
    - obsolete file deleted
2013-01-24 14:20:54 +00:00

47 lines
2.4 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Are applications &lt;attribute&gt; than CA-Clipper applications?</title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<a href="harbour.html"><em>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <a href="harbour44.html"><em>General Harbour questions</em></a>
<b>:</b> <em>Are applications &lt;attribute&gt; than CA-Clipper applications?</em><br />
<b>Previous:</b> <a href="harbour45.html"><em>When will Harbour be finished?</em></a><br />
<b>Next:</b> <a href="harbour47.html"><em>What advantages does Harbour have over other Clipper compilers?</em></a>
<hr noshade>
<h2><a name="46"></a>6.2. Are applications &lt;attribute&gt; than CA-Clipper applications?</h2>
<p>Or, to put it another way, will your application be bigger, smaller, slower,
faster, sexier, etc.... Generally, at least at this stage in the life of
Harbour, any given body of code that can be compiled with Harbour and with
<a href="harbour5.html#Trademarks">CA-Clipper</a>, on the same machine and with the
same environment (it wouldn't be much of a comparison otherwise would it?)
will run slower and will probably be &quot;bigger&quot; when compiled with
Harbour.</p>
<p>The same is probably true when comparing Harbour compiled code with other
Clipper compatible compilers.</p>
<p>The reasons for this are many and varied and, as is pointed out in many
places in this document, Harbour is still early in its life and continuing
development and Clipper compatibility are of greatest importance. The issue
of &quot;performance&quot; will be addressed when it is most appropriate
to do so, and when people are available to look into it.</p>
<p>As always, if the performance of Harbour is an issue for you now and you
want to see Harbour perform as per your expectations then
<a href="harbour45.html#WhenFinished">contributions</a> speak louder than benchmark results.</p>
<hr noshade>
<a href="harbour.html"><em>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <a href="harbour44.html"><em>General Harbour questions</em></a>
<b>:</b> <em>Are applications &lt;attribute&gt; than CA-Clipper applications?</em><br />
<b>Previous:</b> <a href="harbour45.html"><em>When will Harbour be finished?</em></a><br />
<b>Next:</b> <a href="harbour47.html"><em>What advantages does Harbour have over other Clipper compilers?</em></a>
</body>
</html>