Files
harbour-core/website/faq/harbour18.html
vszakats a4a357a18b 2013-03-15 11:12 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour syenar.net)
* /harbour/* -> /*
    * moved whole Harbour source tree one level up to
      avoid single 'harbour' top dir
2013-03-15 11:13:30 +01:00

47 lines
2.2 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>So why don't you use the LGPL?</title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<a href="harbour.html"><em>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <a href="harbour6.html"><em>About Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <em>So why don't you use the LGPL?</em><br />
<b>Previous:</b> <a href="harbour17.html"><em>What is the Harbour exception?</em></a><br />
<b>Next:</b> <a href="harbour19.html"><em>Will my applications be affected by the GPL?</em></a>
<hr noshade>
<h2><a name="18"></a>2.12. So why don't you use the LGPL?</h2>
<p>Given
<a href="harbour17.html#HarbourException">the above</a> it might be reasonable to
ask why the Harbour developers didn't elect to use the <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licenses/licenses.html#LGPL">LGPL</a> instead. The
reason simply comes down to the requirements of the LGPL and what can be
reasonably asked of anyone who wishes to make use of Harbour.</p>
<p>The LGPL requires that any binary distribution of the LGPLd code (in other
words, an application compiled with Harbour and linked against the HVM and
RTL) should be distributed in a method that allows the user to re-link the
application against different and/or later copies of the code under the
LGPL. This is an unreasonable and unworkable requirement as far as the
Harbour developers are concerned.</p>
<p>For the most part it would be fine on platforms where an application can be
linked against a dynamic version of the HVM and RTL, but any platform that
doesn't support dynamic linking (PC/MS/DR/Open/Free-DOS for example) would
be effectively shut out of Harbour usage. The Harbour developers consider
this to be a reduction of freedom and this isn't acceptable for free
software.</p>
<hr noshade>
<a href="harbour.html"><em>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <a href="harbour6.html"><em>About Harbour</em></a>
<b>:</b> <em>So why don't you use the LGPL?</em><br />
<b>Previous:</b> <a href="harbour17.html"><em>What is the Harbour exception?</em></a><br />
<b>Next:</b> <a href="harbour19.html"><em>Will my applications be affected by the GPL?</em></a>
</body>
</html>