300160d8b0
+ website
+ Added Harbour website (except art, docs and stat subdirs)
; TODO: configure automatic mechanism to extract site from
here and regularly updload to sf.net web area
; TODO: Clean HTML code, remove unused picture/files, avoid JS
Any takers?
; NOTE: Please make modifications to website code only in
SVN, then upload the content to web server manually.
IOW never update on web server directly.
48 lines
2.5 KiB
HTML
48 lines
2.5 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<LINK REV="made" HREF="mailto:harbour-faq@netfang.net">
|
|
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
|
|
<TITLE>Are applications <attribute> than CA-Clipper applications?</TITLE>
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
|
|
|
|
<A HREF="harbour.html"><EM>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</EM></A>
|
|
<b>:</b> <A HREF="harbour44.html"><EM>General Harbour questions</EM></A>
|
|
<b>:</b> <EM>Are applications <attribute> than CA-Clipper applications?</EM><BR>
|
|
<b>Previous:</b> <A HREF="harbour45.html"><EM>When will Harbour be finished?</EM></A><BR>
|
|
<b>Next:</b> <A HREF="harbour47.html"><EM>What advantages does Harbour have over other Clipper compilers?</EM></A>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<HR NOSHADE>
|
|
<H2><A NAME="46"></A>6.2. Are applications <attribute> than CA-Clipper applications?</H2>
|
|
<p>Or, to put it another way, will your application be bigger, smaller, slower,
|
|
faster, sexier, etc.... Generally, at least at this stage in the life of
|
|
Harbour, any given body of code that can be compiled with Harbour and with
|
|
<A HREF="harbour5.html#Trademarks">CA-Clipper</A>, on the same machine and with the
|
|
same environment (it wouldn't be much of a comparison otherwise would it?)
|
|
will run slower and will probably be "bigger" when compiled with
|
|
Harbour.</p>
|
|
<p>The same is probably true when comparing Harbour compiled code with other
|
|
Clipper compatible compilers.</p>
|
|
<p>The reasons for this are many and varied and, as is pointed out in many
|
|
places in this document, Harbour is still early in its life and continuing
|
|
development and Clipper compatibility are of greatest importance. The issue
|
|
of "performance" will be addressed when it is most appropriate
|
|
to do so, and when people are available to look into it.</p>
|
|
<p>As always, if the performance of Harbour is an issue for you now and you
|
|
want to see Harbour perform as per your expectations then
|
|
<A HREF="harbour45.html#WhenFinished">contributions</A> speak louder than benchmark results.</p>
|
|
|
|
<HR NOSHADE>
|
|
<A HREF="harbour.html"><EM>Frequently Asked Questions about Harbour</EM></A>
|
|
<b>:</b> <A HREF="harbour44.html"><EM>General Harbour questions</EM></A>
|
|
<b>:</b> <EM>Are applications <attribute> than CA-Clipper applications?</EM><BR>
|
|
<b>Previous:</b> <A HREF="harbour45.html"><EM>When will Harbour be finished?</EM></A><BR>
|
|
<b>Next:</b> <A HREF="harbour47.html"><EM>What advantages does Harbour have over other Clipper compilers?</EM></A>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</BODY>
|
|
</HTML>
|