fivedev/harbour-core
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2011-04-13 03:13 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)

Browse Source 
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
    + Added TOFIX. There is a build error caused by gpm, when
      trying to build 64-bit Harbour on a 32-bit Ubuntu (10.10)
      Linux. gpm lib is not available in 64-bit form, but
      32-bit hbmk2 is built flagged with HB_HAS_GPM, so when
      run it will want to include gpm also for 64-bit target.
      I'm not sure what is the solution for this. Ideally
      hbmk2 should dynamically decide if gpm is really required
      for a given target. It could f.e. look into gttrm lib
      to check for this.
      [ though maybe this build scenario is just too awkward
      for any sane purpose, even more so because X11 is also
      not available in 64-bit form, limiting its use even more.
      Probably it's more realistic goal to cross-build 32-bit
      targets on a 64-bit host. ]
This commit is contained in:
Viktor Szakats
2011-04-14 01:16:17 +00:00
parent c4271f227a
commit 58d01b9e0e
2 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
harbour/ChangeLog
View File

@@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
The license applies to all entries newer than 2009-04-28.
*/
2011-04-13 03:13 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
+ Added TOFIX. There is a build error caused by gpm, when
trying to build 64-bit Harbour on a 32-bit Ubuntu (10.10)
Linux. gpm lib is not available in 64-bit form, but
32-bit hbmk2 is built flagged with HB_HAS_GPM, so when
run it will want to include gpm also for 64-bit target.
I'm not sure what is the solution for this. Ideally
hbmk2 should dynamically decide if gpm is really required
for a given target. It could f.e. look into gttrm lib
to check for this.
[ though maybe this build scenario is just too awkward
for any sane purpose, even more so because X11 is also
not available in 64-bit form, limiting its use even more.
Probably it's more realistic goal to cross-build 32-bit
targets on a 64-bit host. ]
2011-04-13 22:33 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
* utils/hbmk2/*.po

9
harbour/utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
View File

@@ -5495,6 +5495,15 @@ FUNCTION hbmk2( aArgs, nArgTarget, /* @ */ lPause, nLevel )
/* Process build-time configuration */
/* TOFIX: This doesn't work well when doing cross-platform
build f.e. on a 32-bit *nix system to 64-bit target
where the 64-bit target doesn't happen to provide
64-bit flavor of gpm lib. This is the case when
building 64-bit target on a 32-bit Ubuntu 10.10
system. Moral of the story: we should decide about
gpm using dynamic information instead of using
hbmk2 build-time default HB_HAS_GPM value.
[vszakats] */
#if defined( HB_HAS_GPM )
IF hbmk[ _HBMK_cPLAT ] == "linux"
FOR EACH tmp IN l_aLIBHB