Pritpal Bedi 89429d07f0 2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (pritpal@vouchcac.com) ...

* contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
  * contrib/hbxbp/xbpstatic.prg
    + Implemented XBPSTATIC_TYPE_BITMAP. It is not Xbase++ compatible 
      in the sense it is pulled from a disk file. But by attributes wise
      it is exactly like Xbase++.

    SUGGESSIONS: Should I implement Harbour extensions to the Xbp* classes?
                 I find a wide scope to add few more instance variables to the 
                 class.

2009-07-02 16:28:41 +00:00

harbour

2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (pritpal@vouchcac.com)

2009-07-02 16:28:41 +00:00

Description

Harbour Core — Reference source for Five development

172 MiB

Languages

C 80.3%

xBase 17.8%

Makefile 0.6%

C++ 0.4%

Harbour 0.4%

Other 0.3%